Abstract of Meeting Paper

Society for Risk Analysis-Europe 1997 Annual Meeting

Risk Management in Nuclear Energy Sector: Marginal Costs Optimization Method (MCOM). A. Fedorov, V.A. Legasov International Foundation for Safe Development of Civilisation, 8 Gabrichevskogo St., Apt.# 14, 123367 Moscow, Russia Fax: +7 095 190 2433; S. Khetagurov, Ministry of Extraordinary Situations of Russian Federation; and I. Kuz’min, Russian Research Center "Kurchatov Institute", Moscow

The method for nuclear risk management is proposed to operationalize ICRP Guiding Principles for Radiological Protection. These principles require that all risks, rising from nuclear cycle, must be managed in such a way as to maximize the net benefit to society. Practical implementation of this "optimization" principle poses serious difficulties because the consistent methodology for quantification and comparison across all risks and benefits associated with nuclear energy is yet to be developed. In the proposed MCOM, gains and losses in life expectancy are used to measure benefits and costs of a practice. The difference between these gains and losses, called "net benefit", is then maximized, using the range of available alternatives and policies. Marginal life prolongation cost (MLPC), defined as the dollar amount of GDP, needed to increase life expectancy in a given country by one year, is used to calculate the benefit of a practice. Life-saving cost (LSQ), associated with radiological protection measures, is used to quantify aggregated risks of nuclear energy cycle. The overall expenditures in risk reduction are proven to be optimal when MLPC equals LSC. Because MPLC indicator characterizes the socio-economic system as a whole, our method presents an attempt to balance the cost of radiological risk reduction against all other societal risks and benefits of nuclear energy. The optimal investments in radiological risk reduction are calculated for a number of countries and compared with existing present-day expenditures. A simple "rule of a thumb" is derived: optimal cost of collective dose reduction by 1 man Sv for a given country equals its GDP (in ths dol.) per person squared. Non-linear dependency may be explained by the law of diminishing returns. The proposed MCOM may serve as a benchmark in important safety decisions.


Go to:

    Table of Contents of the 1997 SRA-Europe Conference
    Program of the 1997 SRA-Europe Conference
    RiskWorld Welcome Page
    Tec-Com, Inc.