| 1998 Full-text Online
Casebook: "Risk Analysis in the Courts: A Roadmap for Risk Analysts" |
|||
Menu of 1998 Full-text Online Casebook
|
|||
|
(Poster 9) ELEMENTS OF A CIVIL LAWSUIT Second Element of Liability: Causation (Cont.) APPELLATE REVIEW OF ADMISSIBILITY DECISIONS *The Supreme Court's New Expert Evidence Trilogy What Standards Determine the Admissibility of Expert Testimony? Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S.579 (1993) expert testimony at issue concerned possible link between drug and birth defects trial judge must act as gatekeeper to determine whether evidence
for scientific evidence, reliability means developed through the scientific method; factors to consider include:
What Standard of Review Applies to Trial Court Admissibility Decisions? General Electric Co. v. Joiner 522 U.S.136 (1997) expert testimony at issue was medical/toxicological testimony on cause of plaintiff's lung cancer trial court excluded experts linking PCB exposure to plaintiff's lung cancer 11th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, applying "particularly stringent review" to trial courts exclusion of evidence U.S. Supreme Court held appellate court must apply deferential "abuse of discretion" standard of review to trial courts decision; affirmed trial court What Kinds of Expert Testimony Are Subject to the Daubert Factors? Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, to be decided in 1998-99 term tire failure expert testified on cause of blowout trial court excluded evidence, applying Daubert factors 11th Circuit held testimony not subject to Daubert standards for scientific evidence the Supreme Court's decision may impact the applicability of Daubert to:
[Poulter] Do you have any additions or
comments? |
|
||
Copyright © 2000.
John Applegate and Wendy Wagner. |
|||